Sunil Gavaskar asks BCCI to appoint Ravi Shastri, other former cricketers to key roles
Sunil Gavaskar Advocates for Structural Reforms in Indian Domestic Cricket: A Prediction for a Stronger Future
Legendary Indian cricketer Sunil Gavaskar has recently voiced his concerns and innovative suggestions regarding the current state of domestic cricket in India. His insights, published in his column for Mid-Day, focus on the need for a comprehensive overhaul of how the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) manages and develops its cricketing talent at the grassroots and professional levels. Central to his argument is the proposal to expand and empower the Cricket Advisory Committee (CAC), which could serve as a pivotal body in shaping the future of Indian cricket domestically and internationally.
The Controversy Over First-Innings Leads in Domestic Finals: A Prediction for Fair Play
Gavaskar’s critique begins with a recent incident in the 2026 Duleep Trophy final, where East Zone, led by Ishan Kishan, was eager to clinch the title based on their first-innings lead. This scenario sparked debates within cricket circles about the fairness and integrity of awarding championships based solely on first-innings results. Many believe this approach does not accurately reflect the prowess and endurance of a team over the entire match.
This situation underscores a broader issue in Indian domestic cricket—how the rules and formats align with the principles of fair competition and prediction of true team strength. Gavaskar’s prediction is that the current system needs a serious review, perhaps moving towards match outcomes that are more representative of overall performance rather than initial advantages. Such reform could influence future tournaments, making them more competitive and credible, and ultimately, more predictive of the best teams in India.
Addressing Structural Flaws: The Role of the BCCI and the Need for a Stronger CAC
In his analysis, Gavaskar emphasizes that the BCCI must take proactive steps to resolve these ongoing issues. A key recommendation is to reinforce the authority and scope of the Cricket Advisory Committee (CAC). Historically, the CAC was formed with the primary responsibility of appointing coaches and selectors and conducting interviews—functions crucial for maintaining the quality and integrity of Indian cricket.
However, the current status of the CAC remains ambiguous. Gavaskar questions whether the committee still exists in its original form or has been sidelined by the newer administrative structures within the BCCI. He predicts that a revitalized and expanded CAC could serve as a vital body to address various issues plaguing domestic cricket, including fixture planning, talent identification, and strategic development.
Expanding the CAC: Including Cricketing Greats to Shape Indian Cricket’s Future
Gavaskar advocates for a strategic expansion of the CAC, inviting some of India’s most celebrated cricketing icons to join the committee. He suggests that legendary players such as Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, Sourav Ganguly, Ravi Shastri, Anil Kumble, Harbhajan Singh, and Virender Sehwag could bring invaluable insights into cricketing decisions, both on and off the field.
Such an inclusion would not only enhance the committee’s expertise but also serve as a bridge between the past and future of Indian cricket, enriching decision-making processes with seasoned perspectives. Gavaskar envisions a CAC that goes beyond selection, extending its responsibilities to include fixture scheduling for domestic and international matches, talent scouting, and overall strategic planning—a holistic approach to nurturing Indian cricket.
Prediction: A More Transparent and Inclusive Selection Process
The veteran cricketer’s prediction is that an expanded CAC could revolutionize how India’s cricketing talent is nurtured and promoted. By involving experienced stalwarts, the BCCI can foster a more transparent and merit-based selection process, potentially reducing controversies surrounding team picks and coaching appointments.
This move could also serve as a prediction for a more balanced and competitive domestic cricket environment, which is crucial for preparing players for international challenges. Gavaskar emphasizes that this approach might also help in identifying hidden talents early, ensuring that the pipeline for the Indian cricket team remains robust and dynamic.
Including Women’s Cricket: A Vision for Equal Growth and Recognition
Gavaskar’s vision extends beyond men’s cricket. He strongly advocates for the CAC’s involvement in women’s cricket, emphasizing that the growth of the national women’s teams is intrinsically linked to the strength of domestic tournaments. He suggests that a dedicated committee—comprising experienced former women cricketers and administrators—could play a pivotal role in elevating the standards of women’s cricket in India.
He highlights recent challenges faced by the women’s team, such as struggles during the recent Test match in Colombo, where the Indian bowlers appeared to lack exposure to high-pressure situations—an outcome of limited domestic experience. This prediction underscores the importance of structured domestic tournaments for women, which can be overseen and guided by a specialized committee similar to the CAC.
The Prediction for the Future: A More Strategic and Inclusive Cricket Ecosystem
Sunil Gavaskar’s suggestion is more than just administrative restructuring; it is a prediction that such reforms will lead to a more strategic, transparent, and inclusive cricket ecosystem in India. He envisions a future where the BCCI’s decision-making bodies are composed of cricketing legends and experts, working collaboratively to shape a resilient and competitive Indian cricket team.
By involving icons like Tendulkar, Dravid, and Ganguly in the decision-making process, the BCCI can harness their vast experience to predict and prepare for future challenges. This, Gavaskar suggests, could lead to better talent prediction, more effective coaching strategies, and ultimately, more victories on the international stage.
Conclusion: A Dream or a Reality?
As Gavaskar concludes his column, he leaves readers with a thought-provoking question: “Just thinking about this gives one goosebumps. Will it ever happen, or is it just a dream?” His prediction is that with the right will and vision, the BCCI could indeed transform Indian cricket into a more robust and transparent system—one that predicts and nurtures excellence at every level.
Implementing these changes could mark a new chapter in Indian cricket history—where fairness, expertise, and strategic planning combine to produce a future filled with promise and success. The prediction is clear: if the BCCI takes Gavaskar’s advice, Indian cricket could look forward to a more promising and victorious era, both domestically and on the global stage.


